Hard or desperate? -
The decree "must be seen from two points of view: the
debt under local law and the debt under foreign law," Claudio Loser, former
head of the Department for the Western Hemisphere of the International Monetary
Fund, told AFP.
“Regarding the first, and because they have authority over
these papers, they can extend the terms. Only they have been tougher. This
indicates either more despair or more harshness due to the situation due to the
coronavirus, "he said.
The pandemic burned government papers, which planned to
present an offer to creditors under international jurisdiction by March 31.
"This local deferral of payments gives a signal to
bondholders under foreign law that they cannot (or want) to pay," Loser
analyzed. Although "it does not seem that they want a confrontation in
that field."
"The bondholders abroad are scared because it is not
only Argentina, and perhaps they prefer to be flexible and not enter into a
conflict that is later imitated by others," he added.
"On the one hand, it is a local default, in principle
without consequences, and on the other hand, it releases reserves to comply
with the foreign law bonds," whose maturities are equivalent to some 3.5
billion dollars this year, he told AFP.
Daniel Marx, former Secretary of Finance, agreed that the
decision can be interpreted "as a signal to external creditors to achieve
flexibility in their positions."
"It could also be seen as a consideration to external
creditors who from the beginning raised the advisability of treating emissions
between jurisdictions differently, to the detriment of local law," he
added.

Post a Comment
We want to know your comments and concerns. Remember: Respect distinguishes us, education makes us different...